Exclusive: 3 Lindsay Clancy jurors speak out on holdout, prosecution, defense and more
4 sourcesUpdated 4d ago

Coverage across the spectrum
How we rate outletsLeft 50% · 1Center 50% · 4Right 0% · 0
The story so far
Three jurors from the Lindsay Clancy trial have shared their thoughts on the trial, including the holdout juror who had reasonable doubt but still wouldn't acquit.
The jurors' comments provide insight into the trial, including the prosecution, defense, and the deliberation process.
- The foreperson of the jury said the holdout juror admitted to having reasonable doubt.
- The jurors have spoken out about their experience during the trial.
- The trial involved the prosecution and defense presenting their cases.
- The deliberation process was impacted by the holdout juror's doubts.
Summarised from the linked sources. Methodology
Who's reporting it
- CNBCCNBCCenter
Exclusive: 3 Lindsay Clancy jurors speak out on holdout, prosecution, defense and more
- CBS NewsCNCBS NewsLeft
Lindsay Clancy juror speaks after mistrial: "There was so much doubt"
- WLWTWLWTCenter
Holdout in Lindsay Clancy trial said he had reasonable doubt but still wouldn't acquit, juror says
- NBC NewsNNNBC NewsLeft
Lindsay Clancy juror ‘admitted he had reasonable doubt,’ foreperson says
Why it matters
The trial and the jurors' comments provide insight into the justice system
- The trial's outcome and the jurors' comments may impact future cases
Reader Discussion
Loading comments…





